Blink if you’re human · DYNOMIGHT
Law & Regulation · Jun 26, 2026
Proposes an asymmetric, self-imposed disclosure norm: allow AI use by default but let writers who want a human-authored signal make voluntary, specific declarations of what they did not outsource, creating reputation-backed credibility markers that are more workable and adoption-friendly than blanket mandatory labeling.
Blink if you’re human · DYNOMIGHT
Business, Finance & Industries · Jun 26, 2026
The essay argues that undisclosed AI-written blog posts create a lemon-market/adverse-selection dynamic: readers who can’t tell AI from human work lose trust and engagement when they discover hidden AI authorship, which reduces rewards for human writers and triggers a feedback loop that crowds out human essays, making provenance/trust infrastructure economically important for media.
Blink if you’re human · DYNOMIGHT
Science, Technology & Innovation · Jun 26, 2026
The document argues that readers value human “proof of work” because long-form writing signals the author’s understanding and effort, and secret AI generation undermines that epistemic and social trust—so provenance matters even when output quality looks high.
Blink if you’re human · DYNOMIGHT
Science, Technology & Innovation · Jun 26, 2026
The author frames AI writing help as a 0–100 continuum (self at ~10) and argues for explicit, pre-defined boundaries—allowing factual queries, light rephrasing, and limited edits while rejecting verbatim reuse, new-section prototypes, and full essay cleanups—creating a centaur model and urging products to expose granular assistance modes instead of a binary human-vs-AI choice.